EURUSD swept the floor, rallied into supply, then paid the 1.16425 sell.
This study reviews the exact sequence we followed live: prior-day low sweep, London reclaim, premium supply rejection, bearish session delta, and the executed sell-limit rows.
Research Review, Not Advice
This page explains a recorded market sequence and operator review. It is not a promise that future setups will behave the same way, and it is not personal financial advice.
Trading Analytica EvidenceEURUSD 15M - MAY 26 SWEPT FLOOR AND SUPPLY REJECTION
Yesterday Reference
H 1.16530 / L 1.16290
The prior-day low became the key decision pivot after Tuesday's sweep.
Asia Sweep
1.16230
Price pierced the prior-day low by 6.0 pips before reclaiming.
London High
1.16450
The rally stopped inside the overhead supply shelf.
London/NY Low
1.16150
The rejection leg rotated through the prior low and extended lower.
The day in four legs
The trade did not come from one candle. It came from watching the auction change state across sessions.
Asia short leg
05:30-12:35 IST
Move
1.16356 -> 1.16230
Distance
12.6p
Early pressure pushed through yesterday's low. The key was not the break itself, but whether price could accept below it.
London recovery leg
12:35-16:00 IST
Move
1.16230 -> 1.16450
Distance
22.0p
The reclaim produced a squeeze into upper value. That made the top attractive only if supply actually rejected the rally.
London/NY rejection leg
16:00-21:05 IST
Move
1.16450 -> 1.16150
Distance
30.0p
The clean short sequence. Price failed in premium, then rotated back through the swept decision pivot.
Late bounce
21:05-22:00 IST
Move
1.16150 -> 1.16300
Distance
15.0p
Late-session absorption warned against chasing fresh shorts after the main rotation had already paid.
Why the sell worked
1.16425 was the center of the supply shelf.
The trade worked because entry was placed at premium location. Price rallied from the swept low into the strongest overhead shelf, failed to accept above London high, then rotated down through the prior-day low and into the lower session bracket.
Supply Level
1.16425
Sell Pressure
3.84
Sell limits 0.41 + trapped longs 3.44
Densest local sell shelf. This is why the 1.16425 sell was not random.
Supply Level
1.16400
Sell Pressure
2.89
Upper-value resistance plus trapped-long pressure
First pressure shelf below the London high.
Supply Level
1.16450
Sell Pressure
2.57
Sell limits 0.84 + trapped longs 1.73
London high and final rejection cap.
Auction And Delta
The session tape stayed bearish after the upper rejection.
Session
Range
Close
Delta
Bias
Asia
1.16403 / 1.16230
1.16368
-2059.3
Bearish
London
1.16450 / 1.16150
1.16191
-23589.4
Bearish
New York
1.16365 / 1.16150
around 1.1626
-16897.3
Bearish
London/NY Overlap
1.16365 / 1.16150
1.16191
-21655.6
Bearish
Plain-English Read
The auction was not saying "short forever." It was saying the upper value test failed. Once price rejected 1.16425-1.16450 and session delta stayed negative, the clean rotation target was back toward the swept prior-day low around 1.16290, with deeper extension only if that pivot failed.
Executed Trade Review
Visible broker rows matched the planned supply fade.
These screenshots are used as operator review evidence. The system builds the map, but the operator still owns size, entry, stop, target, and exit management.
Trading Analytica EvidenceCORE 1.16425 SELL
Core 1.16425 sell
SELL 3.0 lots at 1.16425, closed near 1.16289, visible result +$408.
Two additional sell rows around 1.16413-1.16415, closed near 1.16287, visible combined result +$892.
Visible P&L
+$892
What users should learn from this day
The goal is not to memorize one level. The goal is to learn how the system changes its read as price moves.
A swept low is not normal support anymore
Once 1.16290 was pierced to 1.16230 and reclaimed, it changed character. It became a decision pivot: reclaim is bullish, loss of reclaim is bearish.
Headline retail balance was not the whole story
The global positioning ratio was not extreme. The useful clue was local trapped inventory: overhead trapped longs near 1.16400-1.16450 and later support/absorption near the lows.
The trade worked because entry had location
The sell was placed inside the strongest overhead supply shelf. Selling 1.16425 is different from chasing 1.16250 after the move already happened.
Late-session state changed
After the rotation into 1.16150, the system shifted to absorption near the lows. That is why the earlier short was clean, but late chasing was lower quality.
Content Rule
Public wording should describe this as institutional-style absorption or large passive supply. We can show the evidence stack, but we should not claim we know the identity of the participants.
